![]() Sure, it makes no sense for the Tet to make and use human clones, but given that, do we have a good story? I think so. But still, the basic premise is not realistic: a star faring race, searching for energy, is not going to bother going to earth for its water, that is so much more easily available anywhere else, energy itself is much more easily accessible without playing with water for fusion, just stay with your own star, mine your own asteroid belt or gas giants. ![]() How about the likelihood of star travel? OK, you have to grant that otherwise most SF movies pretty much fall flat. Most of these have a fatal flaw that would destroy most of them. Be careful about critiquing modern SF movies about technical stupidities too much. Given that theme, the movie's style, effects, music all worked really well to reinforce that. For me the answer is strong yes, I tend to respond to the emotions a movie is trying to convey, ultimately this is a story of loss and love, a nice universal theme that always resonates. Re stupidities: there are plenty, most of the negative reviews are correct, but they miss the point, which is given a more or less silly premise, do the characters fulfill their struggle properly. Most of the complaints are around technical/realism stupidities, or else being a rip-off of previous movies. Reading through the previous reviews, I find myself agreeing with the negative reviews in one sense, but still disagreeing overall.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |